Singh v. Jaddou et al
| Satnam Singh |
| Ur M. Jaddou, connie nolan, daniel renaud, mayorkas and garland |
| 4:2024cv01137 |
| February 23, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Donna M Ryu |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Satnam Singh (Wu, Conrad) (Filed on 4/16/2024) |
| Filing 8 THIRD CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Plaintiff's Counsel was also notified via email.) Consent/Declination due by 4/25/2024. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2024) |
| Filing 7 Immigration Mandamus Case Procedural Order, (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2024) |
| Filing 6 SECOND CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 4/10/2024. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2024) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 3/26/2024. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2024) |
| Filing 4 Refund Status re #3 Application for Refund Declined. (rgh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2024) |
| Filing 3 Application for Refund, Receipt Number ACANDC-19156073 by Satnam Singh. (Wu, Conrad) (Filed on 2/29/2024) |
| #Electronic filing error. Summons: Please file summons as a separate docket entry. Secondly, please correct defendants names using capitalization for first and last names. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office.Please re-file in its entirety. Re: #1 Complaint, filed by Satnam Singh (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2024) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/11/2024. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2024) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT For a Writ in the Nature of a Mandamus against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-19156073.). Filed by Satnam Singh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Proposed)(Wu, Conrad) (Filed on 2/23/2024) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
