Chiang v. Afifi
| Tina Chiang |
| Sabrina Afifi |
| 3:2024cv01342 |
| March 6, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| James Donato |
| Donna M Ryu |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Petition for Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 See Amended Remand letter at attachment no. 1- CLERK'S NOTICE Remanding case to Superior Court of California, County of Alameda. Per Order at docket no #6 . (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/15/2024: #1 Superior Court address updated.) (anj, COURT STAFF). Modified on 3/15/2024 (anj, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 9 DISREGARD FILING- entered in error - No Further filings in case, per Order at docket no. #6 . Notice of MOTION for Recusal of a District Judge pursuant to U.S.C. B455 and request for Reassignment filed by Sabrina Afifi. Responses due by 3/29/2024. Replies due by 4/5/2024. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2024) Modified on 3/15/2024 (anj, COURT STAFF). Modified on 3/15/2024 (anj, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 8 DISREGARD FILING- entered in error - No Further filings in case, per Order at docket no. #6 . DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Sabrina Afifi.. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2024) Modified on 3/15/2024 (anj, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 7 Case Reassigned to Judge James Donato. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2024) |
Filing 6
ORDER. Defendant Sabrina Afifi has filed a notice of removal and a request to proceed in forma pauperis. Dkt. Nos. 1 & 2. The Court previously granted remand in related Case. No. 23-cv-6235-JD, because this is an unlawful detainer action that does not raise a federal question. Dkt. No. 13. Notwithstanding the Court's order, defendant Afifi re-filed essentially the same removal notice, which asserts a number of grievances against plaintiff Chiang that do not establish federal jurisdiction. Consequently, the case is remanded to state court and closed. The IFP application is denied as moot. No further filings will be accepted. Afifi is advised that another attempt to remove the same claims may result in an award of fees and costs to Chiang under 28 U.S.C. 1447(c). Signed by Judge James Donato on 3/12/2024. (jdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2024) (jdlc1, COURT STAFF). Modified on 3/12/2024 (jdlc1, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER RELATING CASE. Signed by Judge James Donato on 3/12/2024. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 4 Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases: The court sua sponte refers this case to Judge James Donato to determine whether 4:24-cv-01342-DMR Chiang v. Afifi is related to 3:23-cv-06235-JD Chiang v. Afifi. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 3/7/2024. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 6/26/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/3/2024 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Sabrina Afifi. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2024) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior court of California, County of Alameda. Their case number is 23-cv-042037. Filed by Sabrina Afifi. Consent/Declination due by 3/20/2024. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2024) |
| #Electronic filing error. [err102]NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Darryl Dale Yorkey-The docket shows a different address from what is appearing on the document. Please update your personal profile on ECF. Re: #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Sabrina Afifi (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2024) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chiang v. Afifi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tina Chiang | |
| Represented By: | Darryl Dale Yorkey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sabrina Afifi | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
