Vasquez v. Ortega et al
| Isaias Vasquez |
| Jose Ortega, J. Thich, D. Villanueva, Y. Delgado, A. Gomez, M. Romero and Doe Romero |
| 4:2024cv01386 |
| March 7, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| PSLC SJT |
| Kandis A Westmore |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Copy of Docket Sheet and #3 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge emailed to the Plaintiff at S.V.S.P. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2024) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Isaias Vasquez, CDCR # AU3166.The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is directed to submit within 72 hours and in PDF form a certified Prison Trust Account statement for the plaintiff, reflecting the last six months activity, to cdcrfilings@cand.uscourts.gov. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2024) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Under the Civil Rights Act against Y. Delgado, A. Gomez, Jose Ortega, Doe Romero, M. Romero, J. Thich, D. Villanueva (Filing fee IFPP). Filed by Isaias Vasquez. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2024) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
