Noe Valley, LLC v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Plaintiff: Noe Valley, LLC
Defendant: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for First Republic Bank and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Case Number: 4:2024cv01841
Filed: March 25, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Jon S Tigar
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 12 U.S.C. ยง 1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 25, 2024 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Noe Valley, LLC. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation served on 4/16/2024, answer due 5/7/2024. (Romeo, Mark) (Filed on 4/25/2024)
March 27, 2024 Filing 10 CLERKS NOTICE SETTING ZOOM HEARING. Case Management Statement due by 7/23/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/30/2024 02:00 PM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jst Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A combined list of names of all counsel appearing for all parties must be sent in one email to the CRD at JSTCRD@cand.uscourts.gov no later than July 29, 2024 by 2:00 p.m.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. Case Management Statement due by 7/23/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/30/2024 02:00 PM in Oakland, - Videoconference Only. (mll, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2024)
March 27, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings. Judge Charles R. Breyer no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 3/27/2024. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2024)
March 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 3/26/2024. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2024)
March 26, 2024 Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Case Management Statement due by 7/19/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/26/2024 08:30 AM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2024)
March 26, 2024 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2024)
March 26, 2024 Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge Charles R. Breyer. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (wsm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2024)
March 25, 2024 Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Entities by Noe Valley, LLC (Romeo, Mark) (Filed on 3/25/2024)
March 25, 2024 Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Romeo, Mark) (Filed on 3/25/2024)
March 25, 2024 Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by Noe Valley, LLC . (Romeo, Mark) (Filed on 3/25/2024)
March 25, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for First Republic Bank ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-19256791.). Filed by Noe Valley, LLC. (Romeo, Mark) (Filed on 3/25/2024)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Noe Valley, LLC v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Noe Valley, LLC
Represented By: Mark Joseph Romeo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for First Republic Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?