King v. The Lapham Company et al
| Troy Demond King |
| The Lapham Company, Marcella Hardy, Alameda County Bar Association, Sarah Sanford-Smith, Alan Horwitz, Frank Roesch, Marc Branco and Menna Tension |
| 4:2024cv01923 |
| March 28, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Kandis A Westmore |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 6/25/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/2/2024 01:30 PM in Oakland, - To be held by Zoom. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Troy Demond King. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2024) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Alameda County Bar Association, Marc Branco, Marcella Hardy, Alan Horwitz, Frank Roesch, Sarah Sanford-Smith, Menna Tension, The Lapham Company. Filed by Troy Demond King. Consent/Declination due by 4/11/2024. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2024) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
