Garcia-Ortiz v. JANCO FS 3, LLC et al
| Dulce Garcia-Ortiz |
| JANCO FS 3, LLC and JANCO FS3, LLC a Delaware Limited Liability Company doing business as Velociti Services |
| 4:2024cv03486 |
| June 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Kandis A Westmore |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by JANCO FS 3, LLC.. (Levine, Dahn) (Filed on 7/11/2024) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Dulce Garcia-Ortiz.. (Otkupman, Roman) (Filed on 7/3/2024) |
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff and Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 7/17/2024. (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2024) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by JANCO FS 3, LLC, JANCO FS3, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Argenbright Holdings V, LLC, Corporate Parent Argenbright Master Holding, LLC for JANCO FS 3, LLC, JANCO FS3, LLC. (Levine, Dahn) (Filed on 6/14/2024) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by JANCO FS 3, LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, 4 Case Assigned by Intake,, (Levine, Dahn) (Filed on 6/12/2024) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Joint Case Management Statement due by 9/10/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/10/2024 at 01:30 PM in Oakland - Videoconference Only. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2024) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/25/2024. (sec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2024) |
| Answer to Removal Complaint (refer to Docket #1 , Page 46) by JANCO FS 3, LLC, JANCO FS3, LLC. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2024) |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet by JANCO FS 3, LLC CORRECTED CIVIL COVER SHEET. (Levine, Dahn) (Filed on 6/10/2024) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by JANCO FS 3, LLC . (Levine, Dahn) (Filed on 6/10/2024) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Francisco County Superior Court. Their case number is CGC-24-613435, (Filing Fee: $405.00, receipt number ACANDC-19504260). Filed by JANCO FS 3, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Billy Fowler)(Levine, Dahn) (Filed on 6/10/2024) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
