Partosan v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Rustico Partosan
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 4:2024cv09101
Filed: December 17, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 17, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Rustico Partosan. (Siegfried, Katherine) (Filed on 12/17/2024)
December 17, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Carolyn W. Colvin. Filed by Rustico Partosan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Siegfried, Katherine) (Filed on 12/17/2024)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Partosan v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rustico Partosan
Represented By: Katherine Rose Siegfried
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?