Christian v. OneM Communications, Ltd
Plaintiff: Nathan Christian
Defendant: OneM Communications, Ltd
Case Number: 4:2024mc80001
Filed: January 2, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Donna M Ryu
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 2, 2024 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/2/2024)
January 2, 2024 Filing 1 REGISTRATION OF JUDGMENT against OneM Communications, Ltd ( Filing fee $ 52, receipt number ACANDC-18981123.). Filed by Nathan Christian. (Gesund, Keren) (Filed on 1/2/2024) Modified on 1/2/2024 (anj, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Christian v. OneM Communications, Ltd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathan Christian
Represented By: Keren E. Gesund
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OneM Communications, Ltd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?