Benoza v. Charter
Plaintiff: Cora Benoza
Defendant: Shirley S. Charter
Case Number: 5:1995cv20597
Filed: August 3, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
Presiding Judge: James Ware
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER AND JUDGMENT re 15 Stipulation filed by Shirley S. Charter. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff, affirming the February 6, 1997, post-remand, final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. Signed by Judge James Ware on 8/3/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2009)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Benoza v. Charter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cora Benoza
Represented By: Maxine Rhonda Benmour
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shirley S. Charter
Represented By: Donna Wade Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?