Aptix Corporation v. Quickturn Design Sys

Plaintiff: Aptix Corporation
Defendant: Quickturn Design Systems, Inc.
Case Number: 5:1996cv20909
Filed: November 1, 1996
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Jeremy Fogel
Referring Judge: Edward A. Infante
Nature of Suit: Anti-Trust
Cause of Action: 15:15 Antitrust Litigation
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 25, 2012 278 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Reopening Cases; Reassigning Csses to Judge Shubb for Limited Purposes.. Signed by Judge James Ware on 4/24/12. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2012)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aptix Corporation v. Quickturn Design Sys
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aptix Corporation
Represented By: Evangelina Almirantearena
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Quickturn Design Systems, Inc.
Represented By: James C. Brooks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?