In re Ricoh Company Ltd. Patent Litigation
Synopsys, Inc. |
Ricoh Company, Ltd |
Aeroflex Incorporated, AMI Semiconductor, Inc., Matrox Electronic Systems, Ltd., Matrox Graphics, Inc., Matrox International, Inc., Matrox Tech, Inc. and Aeroflex Colorado Springs, Inc. |
5:2003cv02289 |
February 10, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Howard R. Lloyd |
James Ware |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Infringement |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 800 STIPULATION AND ORDER SUPPLEMENTING THE COURT'S APRIL 26, 2012 ORDER AWARDING COSTS WITH AGREED-TO PAYMENT SCHEDULE re 798 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge James Ware on June 12, 2012. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2012) |
Filing 797 STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING DUE DATE FOR SYNOPSYS INC.'S OPPOSITION TO RICOH'S MOTION FOR STAY re 796 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Responses to Motion to Stay due by 6/11/2012. Signed by Chief Judge James Ware on June 7, 2012. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2012) |
Filing 783 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 781 MOTION for Taxation of Costs Upon Remand filed by Synopsys, Inc., Set/Reset Deadlines as to 781 MOTION for Taxation of Costs Upon Remand. Synopsys's Replies due by 4/11/2012. Motion Hearing set for 4/30/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. James Ware. Signed by Judge James Ware on 3/27/12. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2012) |
Filing 780 ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; SETTING HEARING ON MOTION FOR FEES Motion Hearing set for 4/23/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. James Ware. Signed by Judge James Ware on 2/22/12. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2012) |
Filing 771 ORDER GRANTING 770 Notice of Withdrawal as Counsel of Record. Attorney Michael A. Berta terminated. Signed by Judge James Ware on 3/28/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2011) |
Filing 716 STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Stipulation Extending Time to File Opposition to Bill of Costs re 713 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 6/29/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2010) |
Filing 709 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge James Ware on May 28, 2010. (jwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2010) |
Filing 705 ORDER FINDING AS MOOT REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE FOR THE 5/10/2010 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERNECE re 703 Notice of Appearance. Signed by Judge James Ware on 5/5/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2010) |
Filing 674 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER AS AMENDED BY THE COURT re 673 Stipulated Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 2/10/10. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2010) Modified text on 2/11/2010 (cv, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 650 STIPULATION AND ORDER Setting Certain Pre-Trial Schedule Dates re 648 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 12/14/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2009) |
Filing 644 REVISED CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AFTER RECONSIDERATION. Signed by Judge James Ware on October 23, 2009. (jwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2009) |
Filing 640 ORDER Granting Miscellaneous Request Seeking Permission to Bring Technology into the Court re 639 Notice (Other) filed by Ricoh Company, Ltd. Signed by Judge James Ware on 6/11/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2009) |
Filing 638 STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT CONTINUING SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING DATE from 6/5/2009 to 6/12/2009 re 637 Stipulation. Supplemental claim construction hearing date 6/12/2009 9:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. James Ware. Signed by Judge James Ware on 5/22/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2009) |
Filing 635 ORDER CONTINUING MARKMAN HEARING FROM 5/22/2009 TO 6/5/2009. Claim Construction Hearing set for 6/5/2009 at 10:00 AM. Signed by Judge James Ware on 5/7/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2009) |
Filing 623 STIPULATION AND ORDER Modifying Briefing Schedule and Hearing Date on Supplemental Claim Construction Hearing re 622 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 3/16/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2009) |
Filing 620 ORDER Finding as Moot re 618 Miscellaneous Administrative Request Seeking Permission to Bring Technology into the Court filed by Ricoh Company, Ltd. the Court previously vacated the 1/30/2009. Signed by Judge James Ware on 2/6/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2009) |
Filing 619 ORDER VACATING HEARING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT re 571 MOTION for Summary Judgment Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc.'s and Customer Defendants' Notice of Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement of noninfringement of U.S. Patent 4,922,432 filed by Synopsys, Inc. The Court finds that the motion is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The 1/30/2009 hearing is VACATED. Signed by Judge James Ware on 1/28/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2009) |
Filing 559 ORDER FOLLOWING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Tutorial Hearing set for 12/5/2008 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Plaintiff's Motion of Non-Infringement. Hearing set for 1/23/2009 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose..Plaintif f SHALL notice this MOTION in accordance with the Civil Local Rules of the Court. Once the briefing is closed, the moving party SHALL compile a three ring binder (to be lodged with the Court) containing the motion and any supporting documents. The Court REFERS the parties to the assigned Magistrate Judge for all discovery disputes. Signed by Judge James Ware on 10/2/2008. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2008) Modified text on 10/9/2008 (cv, COURT STAFF). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.