Evans v. Department of Corrections
| 5:2003cv05420 |
| December 3, 2003 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Ronald M. Whyte |
| Both |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
187
ORDER by Judge Whyte denying 186 Motion for Relief from Judgment. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2010)
|
|
Filing
184
ORDER denying request for additional time to file notice of appeal. Signed by Judge Whyte on 6/14/10. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2010)
|
|
Filing
177
JUDGMENT signed by Judge Whyte on 1/5/10. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2010)
|
|
Filing
166
ORDER by Judge Whyte granting 164 Motion Relief From Judgment Under Rule 60. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2009)
|
|
Filing
163
ORDER by Judge Whyte denying 151 Motion for Relief From Judgment Under Rule 60. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2009)
|
|
Filing
157
ORDER vacating hearing. Signed by Judge Whyte on 10/22/08. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2008)
|
|
Filing
146
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 9/8/2008. (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Evans v. Department of Corrections | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
