Sullivan v. Ryan et al

Sullivan v. Ryan et al

Case Number:	5:2004cv02089
Filed:	May 26, 2004
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office:	San Jose Office
Presiding Judge:	James Ware
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 30, 2011	Filing 80 JUDGMENT. The Court has dismissed all claims against Defendants, and granted their motion for summary judgment. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants. The Clerk shall close the file. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/30/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2011)
October 19, 2010	Filing 64 ORDER ON REMAND; DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION OR NOTICEREGARDING SUCH MOTION. No later than sixty (60) days from the date of this order, defendants shall file a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff's opposition to the dispos itive motion shall be filed with the Court and served on defendants no later than thirty (30) days from the date defendants' motion is filed. Defendants shall file a reply brief no later than fifteen (15) daysafter plaintiff's opposition is filed. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. No hearing will be held on the motion unless the Court so orders at a later date. Signed by Judge James Ware on 10/18/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2010)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 30, 2011

Filing 80 JUDGMENT. The Court has dismissed all claims against Defendants, and granted their motion for summary judgment. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants. The Clerk shall close the file. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/30/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2011)

October 19, 2010

Filing 64 ORDER ON REMAND; DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION OR NOTICEREGARDING SUCH MOTION. No later than sixty (60) days from the date of this order, defendants shall file a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff's opposition to the dispos itive motion shall be filed with the Court and served on defendants no later than thirty (30) days from the date defendants' motion is filed. Defendants shall file a reply brief no later than fifteen (15) daysafter plaintiff's opposition is filed. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. No hearing will be held on the motion unless the Court so orders at a later date. Signed by Judge James Ware on 10/18/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2010)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sullivan v. Ryan et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?