Gorman v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLP et al
5:2004cv04507 |
October 25, 2004 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Other Statutory Actions Office |
Richard Seeborg |
James Ware |
None |
Federal Question |
15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 152 STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Dismissal with prejudice Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1) re 151 Stipulation. The Clerk shall close this file. ***4/4/2011 Hearing/Deadlines terminated. Signed by Judge James Ware on 3/24/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2011) |
Filing 150 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 3/25/2011. Case Management Conference set for 4/4/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge James Ware on 2/23/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2011) |
Filing 148 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERNECE. Stipulated Dismissal or Joint Case Management Statement due by 2/18/2011. Case Management Conference set for 2/28/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge James Ware on 1/20/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2011) |
Filing 146 ORDER DENYING 145 TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Court does not find good cause to continue the January 24 Conference. On December 10, 2010, the parties filed a Stipulation seeking continuance of the December 20 Conference which the C ourt granted. This is the parties' second request for a continuance based on settlement discussions. Accordingly, the Court DENIES the parties' Stipulation to Continue. On or before January 14, 2011, the parties shall file a Joint Statement updating the Court on settlement efforts. Signed by Judge James Ware on 1/14/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2011) |
Filing 144 STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Request to Substitute Party re 143 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 12/21/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2010) |
Filing 142 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Based on the parties' representation, the Court finds good cause to continue the Conference. Accordingly, the Court CONTINUES the Case Management Conference to January 24, 2011 at 10 a.m. On or befor e January 14, 2011, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement updating the Court on the status of the settlement negotiations or provide the Court with a proposed schedule as to how this case should proceed. Signed by Judge James Ware on 12/14/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2010) |
Filing 127 ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 126 Case Management Statement filed by MBNA American Bank, N.A. In light of the parties' representation, the Court VACATES the Case Management Conference currently set for March 9, 2009. The Court will set another conference date once the mandate is issued. Signed by Judge James Ware on 3/3/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2009) |
Filing 125 ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE IN LIGHT OF NINTH CIRCUIT REMAND re 124 USCA Order. Joint Case Management Conference statement due 2/27/2009. Further Case Management Conference set for 3/9/2009 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. James Ware. Signed by Judge James Ware on 2/4/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2009) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gorman v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLP et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.