Williams v. Vidmar et al
5:2004cv04946 |
November 22, 2004 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Patricia V. Trumbull |
James Ware |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT and Dismissal With Prejudice of Plaintiff Stephen Williams and Defendant Patricia Vidmar by Patricia Vidmar, Patricia Vidmar. (Davis, Mark) (Filed on 8/11/2005) |
Filing 34 DEFENDANTS' ANSWER to Amended Complaint byBen Liao, Josephine Lucey, Gary McCue, George Tyson, Patricia Vidmar, William Bragg, Pearl Cheng. (Davis, Mark) (Filed on 5/27/2005) |
Filing 33 AMENDED COMPLAINT (Second) against all defendants. Filed byStephen J. Williams. (Theriot, Kevin) (Filed on 5/13/2005) |
Filing 20 AMENDED COMPLAINT (First) against all defendants. Filed byStephen J. Williams. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Theriot, Kevin) (Filed on 1/3/2005) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Summons Issued) against all defendants ( Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 4410482.). Filed byStephen J. Williams. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2004) Additional attachment(s) added on 12/15/2004 (bw, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Williams v. Vidmar et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.