Cavitt v. Woodford
| 5:2005cv03064 |
| July 28, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Jeremy Fogel |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 9/1/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2010)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 8/30/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2010)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER by Judge Jeremy Fogel granting 85 Motion to Appoint Counsel.(jflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2010)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER GRANTING 82 PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND SETTING HEARING. Hearing set for 5/14/2010 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 2/22/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2010)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER REOPENING HABEAS ACTION; TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 6/23/09. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cavitt v. Woodford | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
