Smith v. Kirkland
| 5:2005cv05168 |
| December 13, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Richard Seeborg |
| Ronald M. Whyte |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
ORDER by Judge Whyte granting 26 39 Motion for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2013)
|
|
Filing
25
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on June 11, 2012. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2012)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER by Judge Whyte granting 19 Ex Parte Application.(rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2010)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER by Judge Whyte granting 17 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2010)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER to show cause. Signed by Judge Whyte on 2/9/10. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2010)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER requiring petitioner to amend 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Antoine Smith in response to 12 letter. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 11/10/2008. (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. Kirkland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
