In Re: ATI Technologies HDCP Litigation
| 5:2006cv01303 |
| February 22, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| James Ware |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
144
ORDER FOLLOWING HEARING RE: FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT re 142 MOTION for Attorney Fees, 138 MOTION for Order Granting Final Approval of Proposed Class Action Settlement. The Court orders that on or before 9/3/2009, the pa rties shall file an Amended Final Approval Order and Judgment whereby the parties shall nominate specific Cypres recipients. Please see Order for further specifics. Signed by Judge James Ware on 8/31/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2009)
|
|
Filing
128
STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT re 127 Stipulation filed by Stanley Batsalkin. Discovery cut off set for 12/1/2008. Motion Hearing set for 2/23/2009 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. This is the parties' last and final continuance. The Case Management Conference set for 10/6/2008 is VACATED. Signed by Judge James Ware on 10/2/2008. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: In Re: ATI Technologies HDCP Litigation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
