Donovan et al v. So

Case Number: 5:2006cv04253
Filed: July 11, 2006
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Jose Office
Presiding Judge: Jeremy Fogel
Referring Judge: Richard Seeborg
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Accomodations
Cause of Action: 42:1981 Housing Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 25, 2011 65 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER GRANTING 61 PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO ENFORCE CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 1/24/2011. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2011)
April 20, 2009 60 Opinion or Order of the Court CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER re 59 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 4/17/09. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2009)
March 31, 2009 57 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 3/30/09. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2009)
February 12, 2009 52 Opinion or Order of the Court SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER. Settlement Conference set for 3/30/2009 09:30 AM. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/12/09. (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2009)
January 13, 2009 50 Opinion or Order of the Court STIPULATION AND ORDER re 45 Regarding Trial Date. Jury Selection set for 6/12/2009 01:30AM. Pretrial Conference set for 6/5/2009 11:00 AM. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 12/24/08. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2009)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Donovan et al v. So
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?