E.M. v. Pajaro Valley Unified School District Office of Administrative Hearings et al
| 5:2006cv04694 |
| August 2, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Jeremy Fogel |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
162
CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Pajaro Valley Unified School District Office of Administrative Hearings against E.M. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2012)
|
|
Filing
134
ORDER granting 101 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and denying 105 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on August 27, 2009. (jflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2009)
|
|
Filing
128
ORDER APPROVING 127 STIPULATED JOINT REQUEST FOR STATUS CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 6/12/2009. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2009)
|
|
Filing
115
ORDER CHANGING TIME re 107 . Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion to Strike Hearing set for 10/10/2008 09:00 AM. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 9/9/08. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: E.M. v. Pajaro Valley Unified School District Office of Administrative Hearings et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
