Ferreyra v. Good Samaritan Hospital et al
Frank Ferreyra |
Good Samaritan Hospital, Hospital Corporation of America, Inc., Engineers and Scientists of California, Local #20, International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers and AFL-CIO & CLC |
5:2007cv02581 |
May 15, 2007 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Santa Clara |
Howard R. Lloyd |
Contract: Other |
29 U.S.C. ยง 151 Labor: Review of Agency Action |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 STIPULATION AND ORDER for Dismissal with Prejudice re 41 Stipulation. Each party shall bear their own fees and costs. The Clerk shallclose this file. Signed by Judge James Ware on 1/8/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2009) |
Filing 40 ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING STIPULATED DISMISSAL re 39 Affidavit filed by Frank Ferreyra. Deadline to file stipulated dismissal on or before 12/22/2008. Failure to do so will result in a Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) dismissal for lack of prosecution. Signed by Judge James Ware on 12/16/2008. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2008) |
Filing 37 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re Settlement. Show Cause Response due by 10/10/2008. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 10/20/2008 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. James Ware. Signed by Judge James Ware on 9/24/2008. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2008) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.