Haws et al v. County Of Monterey et al
| Carrie A. Haws, Jimmy D. Haws and Seth Daniel Haws |
| County Of Monterey, Michael Kanalakis and Natividad Medical Center |
| 5:2007cv02599 |
| May 16, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Monterey |
| Richard Seeborg |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
175
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF CASE re 174 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 10/22/09. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2009)
|
|
Filing
173
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 8/26/09. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2009)
|
|
Filing
172
ORDER APPROVING COMPROMISE OF DISPUTED CLAIM FOR ADULT PERSON WITH A DISABILITY (approving 160 ). Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 8/27/2009. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2009)
|
|
Filing
149
ORDER CONTINUING STATUS/CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (approving 145 ). The Status Conference set for 7/10/2009 is CONTINUED to 8/21/2009 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 6/29/2009. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2009)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting 75 Motion to Depose Prisoners (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2008)
|
|
Filing
3
PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM AND ORDER THEREON. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/17/07. (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2007)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
