Martinez et al v. Lumber et al
| Guadalupe Soto, Angel Lomeli and Augustine Martinez |
| Ac Lumber, Surinder Chawla and Amar S. Chawla |
| 5:2007cv02710 |
| May 22, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Jeremy Fogel |
| Richard Seeborg |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 203 Equal Pay Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER re 45 Dismissing Case Without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on 12/9/09. (pvtlc1) (Filed on 12/10/2009)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER to Show Cause Why Remaining State Law Claims Should Not Be Dismissed Without Prejudice; and ORDER Setting Schedule. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on 11/6/09. (pvtlc1) (Filed on 11/9/2009)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER DIRECTING THAT CASE BE REASSIGNED TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE TRUMBULL. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 10/28/2009. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2009)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER TERMINATING SETTLEMENT COUNSEL PARTICIPATION IN THE ASSISTED SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE PROGRAM. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/7/08. (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2008)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER SETTING FURTHER SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Further Settlement Conference set for 9/30/2008 01:30 PM. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/25/08. (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
