Warner Brothers Records, Inc. et al-v-John Doe #10
Plaintiff: Warner Brothers Records, Inc., Sony BMG Music Entertainment, UMG Recordings, Inc. and Virgin Records America, Inc.
Defendant: John Doe #10
Case Number: 5:2007cv04853
Filed: September 21, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: Los Angeles
Presiding Judge: Howard R. Lloyd
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER REMOVING CASE FROM ASSISTED SETTLEMENT PROGRAM. Signed by Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 3/2/09. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2009)
February 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER. Signed by Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 2/18/09. Case management conference continued to 4/14/09.(hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2009)
December 23, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/23/08. (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2008)
December 1, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER re 43 Declaration in Support filed by Casey Melinda Lentz. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 12/01/08. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2008)
November 18, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 42 SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/18/08. (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2008)
October 8, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER re 38 Notice (Other), Notice (Other) filed by Virgin Records America, Inc., Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Warner Brothers Records, Inc., UMG Recordings, Inc. GRANTING REQUEST FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; CONTINUING CMC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 10/8/08. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2008)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Warner Brothers Records, Inc. et al-v-John Doe #10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Warner Brothers Records, Inc.
Represented By: Matthew Franklin Jaksa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sony BMG Music Entertainment
Represented By: Matthew Franklin Jaksa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UMG Recordings, Inc.
Represented By: Matthew Franklin Jaksa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Virgin Records America, Inc.
Represented By: Matthew Franklin Jaksa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe #10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?