Warner Brothers Records, Inc. et al-v-John Doe #10
Warner Brothers Records, Inc., Sony BMG Music Entertainment, UMG Recordings, Inc. and Virgin Records America, Inc. |
John Doe #10 |
5:2007cv04853 |
September 21, 2007 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Los Angeles |
Howard R. Lloyd |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 ORDER REMOVING CASE FROM ASSISTED SETTLEMENT PROGRAM. Signed by Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 3/2/09. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2009) |
Filing 53 ORDER. Signed by Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 2/18/09. Case management conference continued to 4/14/09.(hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2009) |
Filing 49 ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/23/08. (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2008) |
Filing 44 ORDER re 43 Declaration in Support filed by Casey Melinda Lentz. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 12/01/08. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2008) |
Filing 42 SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/18/08. (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2008) |
Filing 39 ORDER re 38 Notice (Other), Notice (Other) filed by Virgin Records America, Inc., Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Warner Brothers Records, Inc., UMG Recordings, Inc. GRANTING REQUEST FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; CONTINUING CMC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 10/8/08. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2008) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.