Corbis Corporation v. Mobiletoys,Inc.
Corbis Corporation |
Mobiletoys,Inc. |
5:2007cv05910 |
November 21, 2007 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Richard Seeborg |
James Ware |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 56 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE re 55 Stipulation. The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge James Ware on 5/27/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2009) |
Filing 54 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT re 53 Notice of Settlement. In light of the settlement, the Court vacates all trial and pretrial dates. Show Cause Response or Stipulated Dismissal due by 5/22/2009. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 6/1/2009 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. James Ware. Signed by Judge James Ware on 5/14/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2009) |
Filing 52 ORDER VACATING 47 JANUARY 22, 2009 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER; MODIFYING CASE SCHEDULE; SETTING NEW CONFERENCE DATE re 51 Stipulation. Close of All Discovery due by 5/4/2009. Last Date to Hear Dispositive Motions due by 6/29/2009. Prel iminary Pretrial Conference Order due 5/8/2009. Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 5/18/2009 11:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. However, in light of the Court's unavailability during the months of July and August, the parties wil l be unable to trial their case until early September. The Court will not entertain further request for extension of the case schedule. The parties shall work in good faith to advance the case within the schedule as modified. Please see Order for further specifics. Signed by Judge James Ware on 3/19/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2009) |
Filing 50 ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting in part and denying in part 31 MOTION to Compel. (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2009) |
Filing 47 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER - (JURY TRIAL). Each side SHALL be responsible for producing a combined folder with ALL of their in limine motions, opposition and replies. **Please note that this binder is NOT a substitute for filing the motions and related papers via ECF; it is designed for the Court to evaluate the motions. TWO copies of the binder SHALL be delivered to the Court (by way of the Clerk's Office) no later that 5 days before the date of the Final Pretrial Conference by 4:00pm, Signed by Judge James Ware on January 22, 2009. (jwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2009) Modified on 3/23/2009 (cv, COURT STAFF). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Corbis Corporation v. Mobiletoys,Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Corbis Corporation | |
Represented By: | Laurence F. Pulgram |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Mobiletoys,Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.