Diaz et al v. City of San Jose
Plaintiff: Juan Diaz, Keith Keesling, Christopher Murphy, Gary Weekley and Karen Allen
Defendant: City of San Jose
Case Number: 5:2007cv06424
Filed: December 20, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Patricia V. Trumbull
Presiding Judge: James Ware
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 60 STIPULATED Judgment re: Settlement of FLSA Claim re 59 Stipulation. *** OSC Deadlines terminated. The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge James Ware on 8/17/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2010)
August 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SETTLEMENT AND STIPULATED DISMISSAL. Stipulated Dismissals or Status Reports to update the Court on the City Counsel's approval of the Settlement as to BOTH cases due by 9/10/2010. Order to Show Cause hearing as to BOTH cases set for 9/20/2010 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Failure to adhere to this Order may subject both parties to appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge James Ware on 8/9/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2010)
March 31, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE RE: SETTLEMENT re (42 in 5:08-cv-02132-JW) Statement, (52 in 5:07-cv-06424-JW) Joint Case Management Statement. Although the Court had previously warned the parties regarding the timeliness of their filings, it appe ars that the parties have once again failed to adhere to the Court's Orders. The Court GRANTS a brief continuance to allow the parties to finalize their Settlement Agreement. The Court continues the Status Conference from 4/5/2010 to 5/24/2010 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Stipulated Dismissals or Joint Status Statement due by 5/14/2010. Failure to timely file the required statement may result in monetary sanctions for both parties. Signed by Judge James Ware on 3/31/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2010)
January 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER Continuing Status Conference from 2/1/2010 to 4/5/2010 re (40 in 5:08-cv-02132-JW) Joint Case Management Statement. Stipulated Dismissals or Joint Status Report due by 3/26/2010. Status Conference set for 4/5/2010 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge James Ware on 1/25/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2010)
October 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER CONTINUING 11/2/2009 STATUS CONFERENCES re (48 in 5:07-cv-06424-JW) Joint Case Management Statement, (37 in 5:08-cv-02132-JW) Joint Case Management Statement. Joint Status Report or Stipulated Dismissal due by 1/22/2010. Status Conference set for 2/1/2010 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge James Ware on 10/27/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2009)
August 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER VACATING PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE; SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE RE: SETTLEMENT re 46 Case Management Statement. The Court finds good cause to VACATE the Preliminary Pretrial Conference currently set for 8/31/2009. Status Conference re S ettlement set for 11/2/2009 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. On or before 10/23/2009, the parties shall file a Joint Status Statement to update the Court on the progress of their settlement. Signed by Judge James Ware on 8/26/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2009) Modified re text formatting on 8/27/2009 (ecg, COURT STAFF).
May 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER CONTINUING PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERNECE FROM 5/11/2009 to 6/8/2009 re 37 Stipulation. Preliminary Pretrial Conference statement due 5/29/2009. Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 6/8/2009 11:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge James Ware on 5/6/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2009)
October 31, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 29 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING THE EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION PERIOD re 28 Stipulation filed by City of San Jose. The Court continued the case management conference from 11/17/2008 to 12/1/2008. The parties are to file a joint case management confe rence statement by 11/21/2008. The Statement shall include, among other things, an update on the parties' ENE efforts and a discovery plan with a proposed date for the close of all discovery. Signed by Judge James Ware on 10/30/2008. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2008)
October 2, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER Continuing Case Management Conference from 10/6/2008 to 11/17/2008 re 26 Joint Case Management Statement filed by City of San Jose. Joint Case Management Conference statement due 11/07/2008. Further Case Management Conference set for 11/17/2008 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. James Ware. Signed by Judge James Ware on 10/2/2008. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2008)
September 24, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 25 STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Second Stipulation Extending The Early Neutral Evaluation Period re 24 Stipulation filed by City of San Jose. Deadline to complete mediation 10/31/2008. Signed by Judge James Ware on 9/24/2008. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2008)
February 8, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint from 2/7/2008 to 2/14/2008 re 4 Stipulation filed by City of San Jose. Signed by Judge James Ware on 2/8/2008. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2008)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Diaz et al v. City of San Jose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Juan Diaz
Represented By: Christopher Eugene Platten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keith Keesling
Represented By: Christopher Eugene Platten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Murphy
Represented By: Christopher Eugene Platten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gary Weekley
Represented By: Christopher Eugene Platten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karen Allen
Represented By: Christopher Eugene Platten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of San Jose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?