Wahl v. American Security Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Michelle T Wahl
Defendant: American Security Insurance Company
Case Number: 5:2008cv00555
Filed: January 25, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: Santa Cruz
Presiding Judge: Richard Seeborg
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 189 FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/30/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2011)
June 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 176 FINDINGS AND ORDER CERTIFYING CLASS FOR SETTLEMENT PURPOSES, DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF CLASS NOTICE, AND SCHEDULING A FAIRNESS HEARING. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/2/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2011)
March 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 172 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 171 VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER ENTERED ON MARCH 4, 2011 AND SETTING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT. Motion Hearing set for 6/2/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/30/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2011)
March 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 169 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 168 AMENDING THE CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER ENTERED ON JANUARY 27, 2011. Bench Trial set for 4/9/2012 09:00 AM before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Pretrial Conference set for 3/29/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/4/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2011)
January 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 167 JOINT PRE TRIAL SCHEDULE AND ORDER. Bench Trial set for 2/13/2012 08:30 AM before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Pretrial Conference set for 2/2/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/27/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2011)
November 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 162 ORDER RE: 153 , 155 DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO FILE: (1) SECOND MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS; (2) SECOND MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/1/2010. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2010)
August 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 151 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: 150 FOR LEAVE TO DEFER PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/23/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2010)
July 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 147 ORDER RE: 132 , 133 , 145 DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; DENYING REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATION FOR INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL; DENYING MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION; DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO SUPPLEMENT PAPERS IN OPPOSITION. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 07/20/2010. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2010)
June 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 137 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 136 CONSOLIDATED HEARING TIME. Motion Hearing set for 7/15/2010 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/4/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2010)
May 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 131 ORDER RE: 93 , 99 GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 05/10/2010. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2010)
February 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 105 ORDER RE: 92 GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL EXHIBITS 1-59 AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 02/02/2010. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2010). Modified on 2/2/2010 (rslc3, COURT STAFF).
October 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 91 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: 90 AMENDING THE CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER ENTERED ON AUGUST 5, 2009. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/29/09. (rslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2009)
October 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER RE: 79 GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND FOR SANCTIONS. (rslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2009)
August 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 83 STIPULATION AND ORDER 82 re: Motion for a Protective Order (rslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2009)
July 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER DENYING 72 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 07/13/09. (rslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2009)
June 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 47 SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/18/2009. 55 Motion to Strike is denied. 64 Administrative Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply is granted. (rslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2009)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wahl v. American Security Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle T Wahl
Represented By: Stephen Francis Yunker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Security Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?