Wine Scout International v. Garcia Family Vineyards, Inc.
Plaintiff: Wine Scout International
Defendant: Garcia Family Vineyards, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2008cv00858
Filed: February 8, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: Napa
Presiding Judge: Richard Seeborg
Presiding Judge: Richard Seeborg
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 23, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER DISMISSING CASE re 26 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 10/20/08. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2008)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wine Scout International v. Garcia Family Vineyards, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wine Scout International
Represented By: Megan Ferrigan Healy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Garcia Family Vineyards, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?