Asustek Computer Inc. v. Technology Properties Limited et al
Plaintiff: Asustek Computer Inc. and Asus Computer International
Defendant: Technology Properties Limited, Patriot Scientific Corporation, Alliacense Limited and MCM Portfolio LLC
Case Number: 5:2008cv00884
Filed: February 8, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Jeremy Fogel
Presiding Judge: Howard R. Lloyd
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Judge Jeremy Fogel on 2/23/09. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2009)
December 18, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 70 RELATED CASE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 12/17/08. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2008)
October 21, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER BY JUDGE JEREMY FOGEL DENYING 24 MOTION TO DISMISS, TO TRANSFER VENUE, AND TO STAY. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2008)
September 22, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 58 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 56 GRANTING Plaintiffs Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 9/19/08. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2008)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Asustek Computer Inc. v. Technology Properties Limited et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Asustek Computer Inc.
Represented By: Mark R. Weinstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Asus Computer International
Represented By: Mark R. Weinstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Technology Properties Limited
Represented By: Christopher Lee Ogden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patriot Scientific Corporation
Represented By: Christopher Lee Ogden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alliacense Limited
Represented By: Christopher Lee Ogden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MCM Portfolio LLC
Represented By: Christopher Lee Ogden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?