Dish Network L.L.C. et al v. SatFTA
Dish Network L.L.C., Echostar Technologies L.L.C. and Nagrastar LLC |
SatFTA |
5:2008cv01561 |
March 21, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Cable/Satellite TV Office |
Santa Clara |
Jeremy Fogel |
Patricia V. Trumbull |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
17:101 Copyright Infringement |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 64 PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on May 13, 2011. (jflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2011) |
Filing 57 ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS' FEES. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on March 31, 2011. (jflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2011) |
Filing 53 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION 44 FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on March 9, 2011. (jflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2011) |
Filing 40 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO DEEM MATTERS ADMITTED AGAINST DEFENDANT by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull granting in part and denying in part 36 Motion for Discovery (pvtlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2009) |
Filing 32 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 1/14/09. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2009) |
Filing 26 ORDER GRANTING 24 PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO ATTEND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE BY TELEPHONE. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 10/7/08. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2008) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.