Zhang v. Chertoff
| 5:2008cv02589 |
| May 22, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Other Immigration Actions Office |
| Richard Seeborg |
| James Ware |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 8:1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER by Judge James Ware granting 5 Alternative Motion to Transfer; denying 9 Cross Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 15 Motion to Relate Case as moot (jwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2008)
|
|
Filing
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER to Vacate Case Management Conference re 26 Stipulation filed by Michael Chertoff. The Case Management Conference scheduled for December 1, 2008, is hereby VACATED. The Court will set a new Case Management Conference, if necessary, in its Order addressing the pending motions. Signed by Judge James Ware on 11/12/2008. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2008)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER by Judge James Ware denying 17 Motion to Continue (jwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2008)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER by Judge James Ware denying 8 Motion to Stay (jwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Zhang v. Chertoff | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
