Landon v. Ernst & Young LLP et al
| Joseph Landon |
| Ernst & Young LLP and Ernst & Young, US, LLP |
| 5:2008cv02853 |
| June 9, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Jeremy Fogel |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
119
ORDER 118 Re: Joint Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 5/22/13. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2013)
|
|
Filing
114
REVISED STIPULATION AND ORDER 108 to Adjust Trial Date and Remaining Pre-Trial Deadlines. Jury Trial set for 7/22/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Ronald M. Whyte. Pretrial Conference set for 7/11/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Ronald M. Whyte. Discovery cut-off date 6/21/2013. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 4/10/13. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2013)
|
|
Filing
107
Order by Hon. Ronald M. Whyte denying 106 Stipulation (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2013)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER TERMINATING DISCOVERY MOTION. All discovery matters having been referred to the undersigned for disposition, Plaintiff's motion to compel 102 will be terminated. The parties shall instead comply with the undersigned's Standing Order re Civil Discovery Disputes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on January 31, 2013. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2013)
|
|
Filing
93
STIPULATION AND ORDER 92 Continuing Case Management Conference: Case Management Conference set for 5/25/2012 10:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 4/23/12. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2012)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER by Judge Whyte denying 86 Motion for Leave to File a Motion for Class Certification. (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2012)
|
|
Filing
72
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference set for 9/3/2010 is CONTINUED to 12/17/2010 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 9/2/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2010)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER GRANTING 50 Motion to Compel; GRANTING 53 Motion to Compel by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd. The December 8, 2009 hearing is vacated. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2009)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS re 46 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 7/17/09. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2009)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER APPROVING 31 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference set for 3/6/2009 is CONTINUED to 3/13/2009 at 10:30 AM. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 3/6/09. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2009)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER APPROVING 28 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference set for 1/9/2009 is CONTINUED to 1/16/2009 at 10:30 AM. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 1/8/09. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2009)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (approving docket no. 23 ). Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 10/24/08. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2008)
|
|
Filing
22
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 Selecting Private ADR, Case referred to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 10/7/08. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
