San Francisco Police Credit Union v. Stewart
Plaintiff: San Francisco Police Credit Union
Defendant: William Bullock Stewart, III
Case Number: 5:2008cv02996
Filed: June 17, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Richard Seeborg
Presiding Judge: Richard Seeborg
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 31, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 134 ORDER BY JUDGE JEREMY FOGEL GRANTING 25 , 41 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REMAND. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2008)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: San Francisco Police Credit Union v. Stewart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: San Francisco Police Credit Union
Represented By: Reilly Dennis Wilkinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Bullock Stewart, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?