Anker v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
M.D. Marc Anker |
Life Insurance Company of North America and The Permanente Medical Group, Inc. Plan 602 |
5:2008cv03017 |
June 19, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office |
Santa Clara |
Howard R Lloyd |
Ronald M Whyte |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2009. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
FILE located at Federal Records Center (FRC), San Bruno, CA: Accession No: 021-2009-5152, Box No: 145. (mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2009) |
Filing 16 ORDER DISMISSING CASE #15 . Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 3/5/09. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2009) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION Re Voluntary Dismissal of Entire Action with Prejudice by Marc Anker. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Dismissing Entire Action With Prejudice)(Darras, Frank) (Filed on 1/28/2009) |
Filing 14 NOTICE by Marc Anker of Settlement (Darras, Frank) (Filed on 1/21/2009) |
Filing 13 Minute Entry: Initial Case Management Conference held on 10/31/2008 before Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd (Date Filed: 10/31/2008). (Tape #FTR.) (pmc, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 10/31/2008) |
Filing 12 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND JOINT REPORT RE FRCP RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES filed by Marc Anker. (Darras, Frank) (Filed on 10/23/2008) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION AND ORDER #10 Selecting Private Mediation. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 10/15/08. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2008) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Marc Anker (Darras, Frank) (Filed on 10/10/2008) |
Filing 9 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint For Benefits Under A Group Disability Employee Benefit Plan and Affirmative Defenses byLife Insurance Company of North America, The Permanente Medical Group, Inc. Plan 602. (Nalty, Sean) (Filed on 8/21/2008) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Life Insurance Company of North America, The Permanente Medical Group, Inc. Plan 602 re #7 Stipulation (Nalty, Sean) (Filed on 7/23/2008) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Life Insurance Company of North America, The Permanente Medical Group, Inc. Plan 602. (Nalty, Sean) (Filed on 7/22/2008) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Marc Anker. The Permanente Medical Group, Inc. Plan 602 served on 6/27/2008, answer due 7/17/2008. (Darras, Frank) (Filed on 7/3/2008) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Marc Anker. Life Insurance Company of North America served on 6/27/2008, answer due 7/17/2008. (Darras, Frank) (Filed on 7/3/2008) |
Filing 4 ADR SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Statement due by 10/24/2008. Case Management Conference set for 10/31/2008 10:30 AM. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order)(dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2008) |
Filing 3 Notice of Interested Parties by Marc Anker, M.D. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2008) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Life Insurance Company of North America, The Permanente Medical Group, Inc. Plan 602. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2008) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Life Insurance Company of North America, The Permanente Medical Group, Inc. Plan 602; Summons issued ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 54611003401). Filed by Marc Anker. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2008) |
CASE DESIGNATED for Electronic Filing. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2008) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.