Avago Technologies U.S., Inc et al v. Venture Corporation Limited
Case Number: 5:2008cv03248
Filed: July 3, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Contract: Other Office
Presiding Judge: Howard R. Lloyd
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 168 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 167 Stipulation filed by Avago Technologies Japan LTD, Avago Technologies Canada Corporation, Avago Technologies International Sales PTE Limited, Avago Technologies U.S., Inc. Signed by Judge James Ware on 1/24/12. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2012)
January 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 166 AMENDED ORDER VACATING PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge James Ware on 1/18/12. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2012)
December 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 163 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 162 Stipulation filed by Avago Technologies Japan LTD, Avago Technologies Canada Corporation, Avago Technologies International Sales PTE Limited, Avago Technologies U.S., Inc. Signed by Judge James Ware on 12/5/11. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2011)
November 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 161 ORDER continuing preliminary pretrial conference. Signed by Judge James Ware on November 8, 2011. (jwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2011)
September 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 159 ORDER CONTINUING PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE Joint Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statement due by 11/4/2011. Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 11/14/2011 11:00 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. James Ware. Signed by Judge James Ware on 9/14/11. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2011)
July 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 157 ORDER RE: DISCOVERY REFERRAL. Signed by Judge James Ware on 7/14/11. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2011)
March 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 153 STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Request to Modify Case Schedule re 151 Stipulation. ***Deadlines terminated re 108 Stipulation. Set/Reset Scheduling Deadlines: Close of All Discovery due by 9/26/2011. Last Date for Hearing Motions due by 11/21/20 11. Preliminary Pretrial Conference statement due 8/19/2011. Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 8/29/2011 11:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. James Ware.. Signed by Judge James Ware on 3/24/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2011)
September 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 108 STIPULATION RE MODIFICATION OF CASE SCHEDULE re 107 Stipulation. The Court modifies the case schedule as follows: Close of All Discovery due by 8/8/2011. Last Date for Hearing Dispositive Motions due by 10/3/2011. Preliminary Pretrial Conference S tatement due 6/17/2011. Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 6/27/2011 11:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. *** Deadlines terminated re 87 Modified Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge James Ware on 9/9/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2010)
May 24, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 90 STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting to File First Amended Answer to First Amended Complaint re 88 Stipulation. The parties have previously filed the attachment to the stipulation as a separate document. See 89 Answer to Complaint. Signed by Judge James Ware on 5/24/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2010)
December 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 84 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd granting in part and denying in part 65 defendant Emcore Corporation's Motion to Compel Initial Disclosures. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2009)
December 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 83 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd denying as moot 70 defendant Emcore Corporation's Motion to Compel Production of Documents. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2009)
August 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 64 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (MODIFIED BY THE COURT) re 63 Proposed Order Stipulated Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 8/22/2009. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2009) Modified docket text to create linkage on 8/26/2009 (ecg, COURT STAFF).
February 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 43 STIPULATION AND ORDER to Enlarge Time for Venture Corporation Limited to Respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint re 41 Stipulation. Response due 3/3/2009. Signed by Judge James Ware on 2/17/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2009)
January 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 37 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 36 Stipulation, filed by Avago Technologies Japan LTD, Avago Technologies Canada Corporation, Avago Technologies International Sales PTE Limited, Avago Technologies U.S., Inc. Signed by Judge James Ware on January 23, 2009. (jwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2009)
January 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 35 STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend Time for Emcore to File Response re 32 Stipulation. Deadline to file Response due 1/22/2009. Signed by Judge James Ware on 1/16/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2009)
December 22, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER Denying 7 Motion to Dismiss; Granting 16 Motion to Dismiss. Amended Complaint due 1/22/2009. Signed by Judge James Ware on 12/22/2008 (jwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2008) Modified docket text on 12/23/2008 (ecg, COURT STAFF).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Avago Technologies U.S., Inc et al v. Venture Corporation Limited
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?