Kidgell v. County of Santa Clara et al
Plaintiff: Gary Howard Kidgell
Defendant: County of Santa Clara, County of Santa Clara Sheriff's Department, Unknown Deputy Sheriff Sergeant and Unknown Deputy Sheriff's Department of Correction Officers
Case Number: 5:2008cv03396
Filed: July 15, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Constitutional - State Statute Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Howard R. Lloyd
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Fed. Question

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 247 ORDER GRANTING 246 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissals of Officers Asban, Roggy, Rhodes, and Helickson. Lynda Rhodes, Robert Roggy, Michelle Asban and Myrna Helikson terminated. These dismissals are made pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 4/13/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2012)
March 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 221 ORDER RE: COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULE 79-5 as to 214 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. The court extends the deadline for Defendants to file a declaration pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5 until Friday, 3/16/2012 at 4:00 p.m. Defenda nts are notified that failure to file a compliant declaration by the extended deadline will result in an order denying Plaintiffs administrative motion and directing Plaintiff to file all documents as part of the public record, even those previously designated as confidential. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/15/2012. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/15/2012. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2012)
September 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 176 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER - (JURY TRIAL). In order to update the Court's docket, the Court hereby terminates all pending motions and asks that the parties re-submit their Motions in Limine and Proposed Jury Instructions ac cording to the Trial Schedule herein. In light of the discussion at the conference, the Court orders as follows: Joint Pretrial Conference Statement, In Limine Motions, and Proposed Jury Instructions Due 3/6/2012. Final Pretrial Conference set for 4 /6/2012 11:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 5th Floor, San Jose. Jury Selection set for 4/16/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila. Jury Trial set for 4/17/2012 09:00 AM; April 18, 2012 at 9:00 AM - 12:00 PM, 1:30 PM - 4 :30 PM; April 19, 2012 at 9:00 AM - 12:00 PM, 1:30 PM - 4:30 PM; April 23, 2012 at 9:00 AM - 12:00 PM April 24, 2012 at 9:00 AM - 12:00 PM, 1:30 PM - 4:30 PM; April 25, 2012 at 9:00 AM - 12:00 PM, 1:30 PM - 4:30 PM; April 26, 2012 at 9:00 AM - 12:00 PM; Jury Deliberations April 30, 2012 through May 2, 2012 in Courtroom 1, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila. Please see Order for further specifics. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/9/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2011)
April 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 167 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 164 Allowing Defendants to Issue Third Party Subpoena for Certain Records. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 4/13/2011. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2011)
February 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 115 STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME FOR IN LIMINE MOTIONS re 114 Stipulation. The due date for in limine motions is reset to March 25, 2011. All other dates set forth in the Court's Preliminary Pretrial Conference Scheduling Order remain the same. Signed by Judge James Ware on 2/15/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2011)
June 24, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER CONTINUING PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE; SETTING DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL TO COMPLETE APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE. Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statement due by 7/9/2010. Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 7/1 9/2010 11:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. The Court finds that any further continuances would cause undue delay and prejudice Defendants. Accordingly, Plaintiff is on notice that this is a final continuance whether or not he secures couns el or his counsel completes the appropriate paper work to be admitted to this Court. It is up to Plaintiff to prosecute his case. ***Deadlines terminated re 95 ORDER. Motions terrminated: 97 MOTION to Continue filed by Gary Howard Kidgell, 90 MOTION to Continue filed by Gary Howard Kidgell. Signed by Judge James Ware on 6/24/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2010)
June 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 95 ORDER CONTINUING PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. Plaintiff's Preliminary Pretrial Conference statement due by 6/22/2010. Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 6/28/2010 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge James Ware on 6/17/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2010)
March 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd granting 62 defendant County of Santa Clara's Motion to Compel. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2010)
February 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 78 INTERIM ORDER re 62 Defendant County of Santa Clara's motion to compel. 3/2/2010 motion hearing is vacated. County to file status report by 3/1/2010. Matter to be deemed submitted on the papers. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 2/22/2010. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2010)
December 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER CONTINUING PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE re 59 Pretrial Conference Statement. Motion Hearing set for 3/8/2010 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Preliminary Pretrial Conference statement due 2/26/2010. Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 3/8/2010 11:00 AM. Signed by Judge James Ware on 12/2/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2009)
September 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 52 STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT CHANGING SCHEDULING ORDER re 51 Stipulation. Close of All Discovery due by 10/30/2009. Last Date to Hear Dispositive Motions by 12/14/2009 09:00 AM. Please see Order for further specifics. Signed by Judge James Ware on 9/1/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2009)
July 31, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 45 INTERIM ORDER re Plaintiff's Discovery Motions. Motion hearing set for 9/1/2009, 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2. Plaintiff's letter re meet-and-confer negotiations due 8/7/2009. Defendants' opposition to discovery motions due 8/11/2009. Plaintiff's reply due 8/18/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 7/31/2009. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2009)
July 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER VACATING PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE; MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER re 35 Stipulation, 38 Pretrial Conference Statement, 34 Case Management Statement. The Pretrial Conference set for 7/6/2009 is VACATED. The parties are ordered to comply with the following modified schedule: Close of All Discovery due by 9/14/2009. Last Date to Hear Dispositive Motions due by 11/16/2009. Please see Order for further specifics. Signed by Judge James Ware on 7/1/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2009)
June 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER CONTINUING PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE from 6/15/2009 to 7/6/2009. Joint Case Management Conference Statement due on or before 6/26/2009. The Statement shall include, among other things, the parties proposed trial schedule. Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 7/6/2009 11:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge James Ware on 6/10/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2009)
January 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 21 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH ADDENDUM (MODIFIED BY THE COURT). Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 1/22/2009. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2009)
November 20, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Early Neutral Evaluation re 7 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 11/20/2008. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2008)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kidgell v. County of Santa Clara et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gary Howard Kidgell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Santa Clara
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Santa Clara Sheriff's Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Deputy Sheriff Sergeant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Deputy Sheriff's Department of Correction Officers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?