United States of America v. Bennets et al
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: John and Nancy Bennets, John F Bennetts, The California Franchise Tax Board Board and Bank Of America
Case Number: 5:2008cv03413
Filed: July 15, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Taxes Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Richard Seeborg
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jury Demanded By: 26:7401 IRS: Tax Liability

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 59 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Motion Hearing set for 4/29/2010 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/31/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2010).
March 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 57 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: 56 TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO 04/01/2010. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 03/01/2010. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2010)
December 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 48 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: 47 TO CHANGE DATE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND TO CONDUCT CONFERENCE TELEPHONICALLY. Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 1/27/2010 02:30 PM. Supplemental Joint Case Management Statement due 1/20/2010. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/7/09. (rslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2009)
May 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER RE: 17 ACCEPTING STIPULATION AS TO LIEN PRIORITY BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD AND BANK OF AMERICA (rslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2009)
October 30, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Initial Case Management Conference continued to 1/7/2009 02:30 PM. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/30/08. (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2008)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Bennets et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Cynthia Lewis Stier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John and Nancy Bennets
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John F Bennetts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The California Franchise Tax Board Board
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bank Of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?