Adobe Systems Incoporated v. Johnson
Plaintiff: Adobe Systems Incoporated
Defendant: Steve Johnson
Case Number: 5:2008cv04043
Filed: August 25, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Copyright Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Jeremy Fogel
Presiding Judge: Richard Seeborg
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER APPROVING 19 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference set for 3/13/2009 is CONTINUED to 5/8/2009 at 10:30 AM. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 3/2/09. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2009)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adobe Systems Incoporated v. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adobe Systems Incoporated
Represented By: Nicole Lynn Drey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steve Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?