Botelho v. Mortgageit, Inc et al
Plaintiff: Henry Botelho
Defendant: U.S. Bank N.A.
Case Number: 5:2008cv04316
Filed: February 16, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
Presiding Judge: Howard R. Lloyd
Presiding Judge: Richard Seeborg
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 84 STANDBY ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 4/21/2011 01:30 PM. Show Cause Response due by 4/14/2011. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/11/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2011)
August 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 78 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 77 TO MODIFY CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER. signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/23/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2010)
February 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER RE: 56 DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 02/16/2010.(rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2010)
January 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 60 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: 59 CONTINUING HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 01/06/2010. (rslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2010)
April 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER Granting Defendant Mortgageit, Inc.'s Request for Telephonic Appearance at Mediation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Wayne D. Brazil on 4/6/2009. (hlk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2009)
January 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER re 21 granting STIPULATION to add FDIC as additional defendant as receiver of IndyMac Bank.. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 1/26/09. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2009)
December 16, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER re 19 granting STIPULATION of the Parties to Continue Initial Case Management Conference. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/3/2009 02:00 PM.. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 12/16/08. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2008)
December 12, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER re 17 GRANTING STIPULATION to Provide Extension for FDIC to Respond to Complaint. Signed by Judge CLAUDIA WILKEN on 12/12/08. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2008)
November 17, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER re 14 GRANTING STIPULATION To Allow FDIC Additional Time To Respond To Complaint. Signed by Judge CLAUDIA WILKEN on 11/17/08. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2008)
October 1, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER re 9 granting STIPULATION to allow FDIC to Intervene and for Stay of Action. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 10/1/08. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2008)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Botelho v. Mortgageit, Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Henry Botelho
Represented By: Thomas A. Jenkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Bank N.A.
Represented By: Joshua Robert Mandell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?