Avago Technologies U.S., Inc. et al v. Microsoft Corporation
Avago Technologies U.S., Inc. and Avago Technologies ECBU IP (Singapore) PTE., LTD |
Microsoft Corporation and Marshall T. Depue |
5:2008cv05268 |
November 20, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Other Statutory Actions Office |
Santa Clara |
Jeremy Fogel |
Patricia V. Trumbull |
Both |
Federal Question |
28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (approving 31 ). Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 5/13/2009. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2009) |
Filing 23 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 to Continue Case Management Conference Until May 1, 2009. Case Management Conference set for 5/1/2009 10:30 AM. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 4/2/09. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2009) |
Filing 22 STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS re 17 , Case referred to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 4/1/09. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2009) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 11 Extending Time for Defendant Depue to Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 1/5/09. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2009) |
Filing 10 ORDER PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2 EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT MICROSOFT CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT (approving docket no. 7 ). Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 12/31/08. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/31/2008) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.