Olivos v. NVIDIA Corp. et al
| Louis Olivos |
| Nvidia Corp. and Hewlett-Packard Co. |
| 5:2008cv05520 |
| December 9, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Other Statutory Actions Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Jeremy Fogel |
| Richard Seeborg |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 15:2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO RELATE CASES; SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 39 MOTION to Continue CASE MANAGMENT CONFERENCE, Related cases: Create association to 5:08-cv-04312-JW. Motions terminated: 39 MOTION to Continue CASE MANAGME NT CONFERENCE. Case Management Conference on 2/23/2009 at 10:00 AM for all the related cases On or before 2/13/2009, the parties in all of the related actions shall file a single Joint Case Management. The Statement shall, among other things, set forth a schedule to advance this case, including a proposed schedule for consolidating the cases into one action and for the appointment of Lead Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel. Until the actions are consolidated and further order of the Court, all documents shall be filed in each individual action. Please see Order for further specifics. Signed by Judge James Ware on 12/30/2008. Signed by Judge James Ware on 12/30/2008. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/30/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
