In re: Farahani
Plaintiff: Fred Farmahin In re: Farahani
Case Number: 5:2008cv05786
Filed: December 30, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Richard Seeborg
Presiding Judge: James Ware
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Fed. Question

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 14 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge James Ware on May 12, 2009. (jwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2009)
January 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER re 7 denying request for emergency Case Management Conference Letter filed by Fred Farmahin In re: Farahani. Signed by Judge James Ware on January 14, 2009. (jwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2009)
December 30, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER DENYING THE REQUEST FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 12/30/08. (sp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/30/2008)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In re: Farahani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fred Farmahin In re: Farahani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?