Pearson et al v. Stryker Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Lawrence Pearson and Michelle Pearson
Defendant: Stryker Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
Case Number: 5:2009cv00221
Filed: November 12, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
Presiding Judge: Howard R. Lloyd
Presiding Judge: James Ware
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 11, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 31 STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE re 30 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 8/11/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2010)
July 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 29 STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE re 28 Stipulation. The Clerk shall close this file. ***Deadlines terminated. Signed by Judge James Ware on 7/9/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2010)
November 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR re 22 Stipulation. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by 120 days from the date of this order. Signed by Judge James Ware on 11/12/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2009)
August 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 20 STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FROM 9/8/2009 to 11/16/2009 re 19 Stipulation. Joint Case Management Conference due 11/6/2009. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/16/2009 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. James Ware. Signed by Judge James Ware on 8/12/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2009)
June 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 6/18/2009 GRANTING re 10 Motion for Intradistrict Transfer. This matter shall be transferred to the San Jose Division. (tehlc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2009)
May 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 12 STIPULATION AND ORDER extending time for defendants to file responsive pleadings. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 05/21/09. (rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2009)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pearson et al v. Stryker Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lawrence Pearson
Represented By: Rachel Beth Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle Pearson
Represented By: Rachel Beth Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stryker Corporation
Represented By: Ralph A. Campillo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
Represented By: Ralph A. Campillo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?