Cook v. Batts
Plaintiff: Michael Charles Cook
Defendant: Curtis Batts
Case Number: 5:2009cv00482
Filed: February 3, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV Office
County: Kern
Presiding Judge: Howard R. Lloyd
Presiding Judge: James Ware
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 33 Notice Certification 32 (rslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2009)
February 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER by Judge James Ware Referring Case to Judge Seeborg for Consideration of Whether Cases are Related (jwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2009)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cook v. Batts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Charles Cook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Curtis Batts
Represented By: Joann M. Swanson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?