Hua v. MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc.
Plaintiff: John Hua
Defendant: MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2009cv00555
Filed: February 6, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Jeremy Fogel
Presiding Judge: Richard Seeborg
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER DENYING 5 MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING 9 MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 5/14/09. (jflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2009)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hua v. MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc.
Represented By: James Goldberg, Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Hua
Represented By: Peter Nicholas Hadiaris, Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?