Hua v. MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc.
John Hua |
MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. |
5:2009cv00555 |
February 6, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Contract: Other Office |
Santa Clara |
Jeremy Fogel |
Richard Seeborg |
None |
Federal Question |
28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER DENYING 5 MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING 9 MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 5/14/09. (jflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2009) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hua v. MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. | |
Represented By: | James Goldberg, Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: John Hua | |
Represented By: | Peter Nicholas Hadiaris, Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.