Castell v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
| Jayce Castell |
| Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Ambrose Employer Group, LLC Long Term Disability Plan |
| 5:2009cv01593 |
| April 10, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Richard Seeborg |
| None |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS' FEES; DENYING 91 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; AND TERMINATING 88 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 8/8/2012. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2012)
|
|
Filing
84
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting in part 74 Motion to Enforce Judgment.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2012)
|
|
Filing
73
AMENDED JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 10/20/2011. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2011)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 11/12/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2010)
|
|
Filing
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS re 16 , Case referred to mediation. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 9/18/09. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2009)
|
|
Filing
23
STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING THE PARTIES STIPULATION TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AT THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 21 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 8/24/09. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
