Bailey et al-v-Excelligence Learning Corporation
| Kristen Bailey and Richard Bailey |
| Excelligence Learning Corporation |
| 5:2009cv02239 |
| May 20, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Monterey |
| Richard Seeborg |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
STIPULATION AND ORDER Dismissing Entire Acton with Prejudice re 19 Stipulation. The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge James Ware on 1/20/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2010)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER CONTINUING 11/2/2009 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 14 Order. It appears that the parties have ignored the Court's October 2 Order, failure to complywith the terms of this Order will result in appropriate sanctions. Joint Case Management Statement due 11/6/2009. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/16/2009 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. James Ware. Signed by Judge James Ware on 10/27/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2009)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 13 Stipulation. Joint Case Management Conference statement due by 10/23/2009. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/2/2009 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge James Ware on 10/1/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
