Pravin et al v. Wipro, Inc.
Jain Pravin, Randy Holthaus, Dilip Kukreja, Mark Warner and Douglas Tanner |
Wipro, Inc. |
5:2009cv02743 |
June 19, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Outside US |
Richard Seeborg |
Defendant |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 164 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/20/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2012) |
Filing 160 ORDER by Judge Seeborg denying 136 Motion for Reconsideration; denying 146 Motion in Limine (rslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2011) |
Filing 133 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd granting 36 Motion to Quash; granting in part and denying in part 39 Motion to Quash; granting in part and denying in part 44 defendant's Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2011) |
Filing 132 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 131 TO MODIFY CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER. Further Case Management Conference set for 11/17/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/1/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2011) |
Filing 129 ORDER RE: DISCOVERY. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/19/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2011) |
Filing 108 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO FILE DEFENDANT WIPRO, INC.'S CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/7/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2011) |
Filing 78 ORDER RE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/28/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2011) |
Filing 72 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: 69 TO RESCHEDULE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT. Further Case Management Conference set for 5/26/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/23/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2011) |
Filing 56 AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 54 TO MODIFY CASE SCHEDULE. Further Case Management Conference set for 3/31/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/26/2011 10:00 AM; Jury Selection set for 6/6/ 2011 09:00 AM before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Jury Trial set for 6/6/2011 09:00 AM before Hon. Richard Seeborg in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/3/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2011) |
Filing 51 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 50 TO MODIFY CASE SCHEDULE. Jury Selection set for 5/9/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Jury Trial set for 5/9/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Pretrial Conference set for 4/28/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco.Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/14/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2010) |
Filing 33 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: 32 TO MODIFY CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER. Further Case Management Conference set for 2/3/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Jury Trial set for 3/7/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Pretrial Conference set for 3/3/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/9/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2010) |
Filing 23 COPY OF STANDING ORDER RE: 22 Case Management Scheduling Order. (rslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2009) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.