Hernandez v. Walker
Anthony Perez Hernandez |
James Walker |
5:2009cv03457 |
July 27, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Sacramento |
Ronald M. Whyte |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 84 ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Granting 83 Motion for Extension of Time to File Traverse. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2014) |
Filing 81 ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Granting 80 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Petition for Habeas Corpus. Responses due by 4/22/2014. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2014) |
Filing 79 ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Granting 78 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. Response due by 2/21/2014. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2014) |
Filing 77 ORDER RE-OPENING CASE; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 10/22/13. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2013) |
Filing 65 ORDER Directing Respondent to File a Response to Petitioner's Motion for Discovery, Motion Seeking Assistance, and Motion for Evidentiary Hearing. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 7/28/11. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2011) |
Filing 58 ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Granting 50 , 57 Motion Extension of Time to File a Traverse. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2011) |
Filing 49 ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Granting 47 Motion for Extension of Time to File a Traverse. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2011) |
Filing 41 ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Granting 40 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2011) |
Filing 32 ORDER Requiring Respondent to File Additional Exhibits. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 7/30/10. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2010) |
Filing 27 ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Denying 22 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2010) |
Filing 21 ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Granting 19 Motion for Extension of Time to File. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2010) |
Filing 17 ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Granting 14 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2010) |
Filing 13 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; Granting Leave to Proceeding In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 12/7/09. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2009) |
Filing 12 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Granting 3 , 5 , 6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; Denying 8 Motion for Discovery; Denying 9 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2009) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hernandez v. Walker | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Anthony Perez Hernandez | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: James Walker | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.