Garcia v. Haviland

Garcia v. Haviland

Petitioner:	Javier Frank Garcia
Respondent:	J. W. Haviland
Case Number:	5:2009cv04264
Filed:	September 15, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office:	San Jose Office
County:	Solano
Presiding Judge:	James Ware
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 19, 2010	Filing 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as moot because petitioner has paid the filing fee. The clerk shall serve by certified mail a copy of this order and the petition and all attachments thereto on respondent and respondents attorney, the Attorney General of the State of California. The clerk also shall serve a copy of this order on petitioner. Motions terminated: 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge James Ware on 2/10/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2010)
November 5, 2009	Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE COMPLETE IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION re 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File. Petitioner must submit the application and supporting documents no later than October 29, 2009. In the alternative, petitione r may file the $5.00 filing fee. FAILURE TO FILE A TIMELY RESPONSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS ORDER WILL RESULT IN THE DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO PETITIONER. Signed by Judge James Ware on 11/3/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2009)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 19, 2010

Filing 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as moot because petitioner has paid the filing fee. The clerk shall serve by certified mail a copy of this order and the petition and all attachments thereto on respondent and respondents attorney, the Attorney General of the State of California. The clerk also shall serve a copy of this order on petitioner. Motions terminated: 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge James Ware on 2/10/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2010)

November 5, 2009

Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE COMPLETE IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION re 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File. Petitioner must submit the application and supporting documents no later than October 29, 2009. In the alternative, petitione r may file the $5.00 filing fee. FAILURE TO FILE A TIMELY RESPONSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS ORDER WILL RESULT IN THE DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO PETITIONER. Signed by Judge James Ware on 11/3/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2009)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garcia v. Haviland
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Javier Frank Garcia
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: J. W. Haviland
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?